One is so small a number to achieve significance – John C. Maxwell
I have been in business for 13 of the 18years of my career. I can say that I know both the Advantages and disadvantages of partnerships. Some of the partnerships I have been involved in have ended not so well and others ended amicably. In all this if you asked me if I would partner, I say yes!
In 2011, while one partnership ended, I got into another. Armed with nothing but lessons, Nomad was born. I cannot explain the last six years except an accolade that was awarded to Nomad last weekend. We entered the survey for Uganda’s TOP 100 Mid-Size Companies 2017. Conducted by the reputable KPMG Audit firm, we were graded and came in at 19th over all.
I could not have achieved this if it had not been for the great partnership with Jeremy Byemanzi and Julius Kwame.
Indeed if one wants to go fast they go alone but if they want to go further they take others along!
Partnership Is Biblical
Partnership is an often overlooked, yet vitally important aspect of New Testament Christianity. Although the ministry of Paul and other prominent New Testament leaders was in some ways unique and, therefore, in some ways unrepeatable, the pattern of partnership is repeatable. God still provides suitably gifted people to facilitate such partnerships today. Paul used the word, “partnership,” to describe both church leaders and churches working together:
In the past, partnership happened between individuals and churches, and churches and churches. They helped each other out in terms of doctrine and practice (Acts 8:14-25; Gal. 3), they relocated leaders to strengthen other situations (Acts 11:19-23, 25-26, 12:25, 16:1-3), they sent individuals and teams on short-term strengthening visits (Acts 11:27, 19:21-22; 1 Cor. 4:15-17; Phil. 2:19-29; 2 Tim. 1:18), they sent money to help each other and bless the wider society (Acts 11:28-30), and they helped advance the gospel together and plant churches (Rom. 15:24; 2 Cor. 10:15-16).
Partnership Is Necessary for Mission and Maturity
Our mission from Jesus is to take the gospel to both the neighborhoods and the nations, to both Jerusalem and the ends of the earth (Matt. 28:19; Acts 1:8). How could any local church do that alone? But if we organize ourselves properly, every church can contribute meaningfully to world mission. Every church can consistently pray and give financially to church plants; and every church can periodically contribute leaders to church plants. Together, our mission can be healthier, stronger, longer, and more sustainable.
In terms of maturity, no matter how experienced a team of local elders are, a local church will not reach full maturity without outside perspective and input. In fact, New Testament translocal ministry had a specific aim to help bring churches to maturity (Col. 1:28, 4:12).
Partnership Is an Expression of Humility and Honors the Body of Christ
Apart from the Biblical precedent of partnership, common sense tells us that no eldership team could maximize their potential without meaningful outside input. On this, Colin Hundermark writes,
“In a corporate or not-for-profit context, it would not be frowned upon – more likely encouraged – to use an external source to contribute to the overall cause and direction of the enterprise. This is typically expressed in one of two ways. Firstly, the role of non-executive directors on a board is oftentimes filled by a subject matter expert or industry doyen, that is, someone that can contribute meaningfully to the overall direction and executive strategy of the business. Moreover, global corporate governance standards require that boards of directors have a minimum number of non-executive directors. Secondly, the use of external strategy and management consultants is commonplace, even for tasks considered the domain of internal teams such as understanding new product opportunities, new markets and new geographies. It would be curious to conclude that the use, or encouragement, of external input should be restricted to the corporate environment. Would it not be unwise for local elders to assume that they and their local church could somehow reach their redemptive potential without outside help?”
Partnership Provides Synergy
Partnership helps enhance a church’s strengths and helps shore up her weaknesses. Partnership helps maximize a church’s potential influence, providing a network through which individuals and churches can influence more broadly than they otherwise could. Partnership provides resources to help a church plant more churches in her region than she could working alone, including prayer, people, finance, encouragement, and skills.
Partnership Provides Protection
Sometimes churches go through immensely challenging seasons. For example, if a church loses a leader to burn out, sickness, or death, it is much easier to support the church and find a suitable replacement leader if the church is part of a partnership.
FOUR PILLARS OF PARTNERSHIP
Agreeing that church-to-church partnerships are Biblical and necessary is the easy part. The challenge is working out how these partnerships worked in the Bible, and then faithfully imitating them. The clearest view that the Bible gives us of church-to-church partnership is the partnership that developed around Paul. This partnership was shaped around four main things, which we have also chosen to partner around:
The content of the epistles testifies to how much Paul wanted the churches that he worked with to believe correct doctrine and be “pillars of truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). Paul didn’t say, “Outside of believing that Jesus is Lord, it doesn’t really matter what you believe. It just matters that we plant more churches!” While planting more churches certainly mattered to Paul, so did having these churches believe the right doctrine and values. See Document 5 Statement of Faith and Values for an overview of our doctrine and values.
In addition to partnering around truth, Pauline partnerships were missionally productive. Together, they planted churches, strengthened churches, and pooled finance for worthy causes, such as drought relief in Judea (1 Cor. 16; 2 Cor. 8:5). Advance partner churches consider themselves active “fellowworkers” (1 Cor. 3:9) in our shared mission to plant and strengthen churches. Advance exists because we are on mission together. The deep sense of camaraderie and belonging that we enjoy is a derivative of our missional partnership, not the purpose of our partnership.
The churches that Paul was involved with couldn’t think about God without thinking about Father or church, without thinking about family (Eph. 3:14-15). The bandwidth of relationships ranged from brotherly connection on one side through to seasoned fathers like Paul on the other (2 Tim. 1:2; 1 Cor. 4:17; 1 Cor. 4:15-16) – but never to a purely functional or corporate atmosphere. Paul encouraged church leaders to lead their churches in a family manner (1 Tim. 5:1-2), and sometimes referred to the churches he partnered with as his children. It was on that basis that he felt authority to encourage, comfort and urge them to live lives worthy of God (1 Thess. 2:6-8, 11-12). Paul even displayed concern for the church leader’s physical health (1 Tim. 5:23) and often ended his letters with lists of personal greetings and messages to people in the church that he had grown to know over years of involvement.
With the pressures of a busy world and an expanding movement, we need to be clear that the relational aspect of church partnership is a Biblical imperative, or else it is easy to opt for a less relational style. Theologically convinced of the importance of genuine relationships and a family feel, we cultivate relationships characterized by genuine affection, respect, honesty, trust, and fun.
Leadership is a gift from God, and necessary to help any group move together – including a movement of churches. Leaders of our movement, and within our movement, are recognized on the basis of sound character and suitable gifts; and they play an important role in helping us partner together. See Document 6 Leadership and Regions for more about how leadership works in Advance.
We believe that the New Testament teaches that local elders are the highest human authority in the local church. Therefore, we consider partner churches as autonomous, but interdependent.
BRIEF REFLECTIONS ON DIFFERENT TYPES OF PARTNERSHIP
To help clarify what we mean by the word, “partnership,” it is helpful to briefly reflect on different types of partnership. Successful partnerships seem to form around either just one of these four components (we could refer to these as “single issue partnerships”), or around all four components (we could refer to these as Pauline-type partnerships), but seldom around two or three components.
Partnerships such as the Gospel Coalition and the Simeon Trust deliberately choose to partner around one main thing: similar doctrine and values. They play an excellent role in helping their partner churches develop similar doctrine and values, but they do not try to mobilize their churches to shared mission,or to genuine relationship; and, therefore, recognized leadership is not a critical factor in the partnership.
Or, think of a Pastors Fraternal in a town consisting of pastors from many different denominations. This would usually be based simply on genuine relationship – a worthy goal. If it made similar doctrine and values a component of partnership, the fraternal would soon fracture. Or, if they tried to do mission together (outside of “neutral” endeavors, such as prayer, or social action projects), things would likely unravel. Or, if one pastor assumes too much in the way of leadership, the fraternal is probably on borrowed time.
Single-issue partnerships such as these can be very valuable, but we believe they should complement Pauline-type partnerships.
Partnering around all four elements is a glorious, yet audacious endeavor. For such a partnership to be successful, equal attention needs to be given to all four components, because they are all inter-dependent. Often, churches don’t know why they are feeling dissatisfied in their partnership until they evaluate their partnership using this Biblical, four-part grid, asking themselves the following questions:
If one of the answers to these questions is “no,” the partnership will feel uncomfortable. If two or three answers are “no,” the partnership will be unsustainable. The New Testament model of partnership assumes all four aspects of partnership, resulting in a holistic, satisfying partnership.
We believe that it is preferable for every local church to be involved in a holistic, Pauline-type partnership, as their primary partnership. They should also then enjoy some subsidiary, single-issue partnerships.
Because Advance aspires to be a holistic, Pauline-type partnership that “ticks all the main boxes” (at least the four main ones), Advance partner churches do not have the capacity, or inclination, for another, similarly comprehensive, partnership. However, Advance partner churches will hopefully enjoy beneficial relationships with other single-issue networks. That said, some Advance partner churches maintain their affiliation with their denomination in a nominal sense, so long as they are free to fully partner with Advance. We describe our partnership as primary but not exclusive. As a movement, we actively honor, learn from, and engage with churches and movements outside of our partnership.